Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 2

< February 1	February 3 >

February 2

File:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cb/Sisterromapicture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cb/Sisterromapicture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

unfreeimage 201.83.184.186 (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image was uploaded and claimed by a banned user. It can be found at http://www.myspace.com/sisterroma/photos/6067755#%7B%22ImageId%22%3A6067755%7D and is apparently copyrighted by Barry Muniz.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PittsfordTownSignRt96.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PittsfordTownSignRt96.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative work of the image on the sign. No FOP in the U.S. Powers ^T 03:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I personally took the picture of this sign and offer it freely to anyone who wishes to use it. The sign is on public property and is created by the Pittsford Town government, a public body. Since the picture is being used solely to illustrates the town, I do not understand why it might be considered non-free and a potential violation of copyright. Truthanado (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone created that sign and owns the copyright on it. Even if he or she created it as a work for hire by the Pittsford town government, the Town of Pittsford retains the copyright on the sign. You can't take simply a picture of it and abrogate the town's (or the artist's) copyright on the work. Powers ^T 14:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The century old Roman Catholic Church in Banate.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The century old Roman Catholic Church in Banate.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Philippines does not have freedom of panorama, therefor photographer cannot release image into the public domain. With the mass of photos already on the page, I doubt fair use can be argued. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Banate Municipal Hall viewed from the North.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banate Municipal Hall viewed from the North.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Philippines does not have freedom of panorama, therefor photographer cannot release image into the public domain. With the mass of photos already on the page, I doubt fair use can be argued. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StRAPHAELCHURCH.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader was blocked over a year ago for creating copyright violations. After reviewing the deleted contributions of the user and comparing those copyright violations to these existing files, I have no choice but to assume the rest of these are infringing on the copyright of an unidentified source, in correspondence with the last sentence of the first paragraph in WP:COPYVIO#Dealing with copyright violations. — ξ ^xplicit 07:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AirforceMQ-11B.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AirforceMQ-11B.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Procedural nomination: declined speedy. This states the image is a "courtesy photo" when hovering the mouse over it. According to User:Marcus Qwertyus, this means the image is not created by the military, and thus non-free. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PICT2888.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PICT2888.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

See commons:Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/02/Category:Cambodia-Vietnam Friendship Monument in Phnom Penh. This work likely qualifies as fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PICT2887.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PICT2887.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

See above. However, unlike commons, we only have to worry about freedom of panorama issues with the art - the surrounding architecture is not subject to copyright under US law. As such, this may qualify as de minimis if we find that the picture is depicting the monument as a whole, not just the artwork therein. I will leave that decision up to the closing administrator. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Macs24.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macs24.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:MACS24.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Ring 3D-theatrical release poster.tiff (delete | talk | history | logs).

Already a picture of nearly the same thing on it's intended page. Possibly un-free. Phearson (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems someone else uploaded a lower-resolution version of the same image. As the uploader of this picture, I agree that it should be taken down.--Ashershow1_talk 21:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well in that case, CSD G7. Phearson (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Majlinda Bregu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Majlinda Bregu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source website is unreliable and very probably hosts many copyvios. Public-domain status improbable. See parallel case of File:Genc_Ruli.jpg and others. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bujar Nishani.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bujar Nishani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Same as above. Unreliable source website. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:John Kasich 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Kasich 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Only works of the US federal government are considered public domain, along with those of Florida and, according to some court decisions, California. Ohio government works do not appear to be public domain, from what I can see. Chick Bowen 23:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G7 as already tagged. :( Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.